La Joaqui destroyed Luck Ra after exposing their supposed romance with Tiago PZK

The separation of La Joaqui and Luck Ra added an unexpected and explosive chapter. After weeks in which both tried to keep the details of the breakup private, a series of public statements ended up breaking the truce and exposed differences that had so far remained intimate.

It all started when the RKT figure spoke during PLP, on Luzu TV, about the infidelities she suffered throughout her life. “I have never had a relationship where I wasn't cheated on until today,” she stated. Although she did not directly mention the Cordoban, her words were quickly interpreted as a reference to her last relationship. Luck Ra then decided to respond and categorically denied having been unfaithful.

“My love and respect for Joaqui has always been true and great. I never cheated on her. She was the most important woman I had in my life,” he expressed. But it was the next part of his message that sparked a new controversy: “I respect her present and it hurts me a lot that I am still linked to this story, as she has been dating a former great friend for some time. It's time to digest it and move on, everything passes.”

The statement was immediately linked to Tiago PZK, who was recently seen with La Joaqui and her daughters during an outing at the Buenos Aires Ecopark. Until that moment, there were rumors of a romance between the artists, but neither had publicly confirmed a relationship.

La Joaqui's response did not take long to arrive. Through her Instagram stories, she published an extensive statement directed at her ex-partner and harshly questioned his decision to speak publicly about her sentimental present.

La Joaqui criticized Luck Ra for exposing her private life

The singer began her defense by pointing out what she considers a contradiction in Luck Ra's words: claiming to respect her present while simultaneously revealing details that she had chosen to keep away from public exposure.

“There is something that I find profoundly contradictory: to say that you respect my present while publicly exposing a part of my intimacy that I chose not to make public,” she began.

But immediately after, she made a revelation that had been unknown until now about the breakup. According to her version, it was Luck Ra who made the decision to end the relationship two months ago and the way he did it was very different from what she chose to publicly share.

“Our relationship ended two months ago, by your decision and in a way that was much colder and more disrespectful than what I ever chose to tell,” she expressed.

“Even after we separated, I preserved things that could have left you looking very bad,” she warned. She then clarified that her silence was not due to fear, but “to the affection, the codes, and the respect” for the relationship they once shared.

“That’s why it hurts me especially that today you confuse my kindness with a place you can abuse,” she stated.

What La Joaqui said about Luck Ra's “former great friend”

Another central point of the statement was directly related to the phrase used by Luck Ra to describe the man with whom his ex-partner would be starting a new relationship.

Although La Joaqui did not write the name of Tiago PZK, she questioned why the Cordoban presented that person simply as a “former great friend” of his because, as she explained, there would be a much earlier and independent history between them apart from Luck Ra.

“You know perfectly well that we have known each other since we were kids. You know that there is a personal, prior, deep, and completely independent history between us,” she maintained.

The singer added that they both know each other from “very sensitive places” and that for years they built a bond that did not need his ex-partner to exist.

For La Joaqui, defining him solely as a former friend of Luck Ra changes the meaning of the story and can create the impression that there was a betrayal.

“Reducing that entire history to ‘my former great friend’ is not telling the truth: it is carefully choosing which part of the truth to tell to suggest a betrayal,” she questioned.