These restrictions affect the right to property and legal security, two fundamental pillars for economic growth. President Milei himself pointed out that if this right is violated, there are no incentives to save and invest.
In the same vein, the current regulations have discouraged investments for decades due to the lack of security and their modification could unlock projects worth billions of dollars in various sectors.
Moreover, the reform does not imply a loss of sovereignty or a “sale of the country,” as claimed by Kirchnerism. In this sense, it distinguishes between private investors, whom it seeks to equate with Argentines, and foreign states or state-owned companies, which will remain subject to restrictions and security controls.
The project also maintains prohibitions in border areas and retains the state's tools to supervise operations, investigate irregularities, and act against possible crimes that threaten national security.
For these reasons, foreign investors do not have the ability to “take” the land, but rather provide capital for productive development, the incorporation of technology, and job creation.
Additionally, reducing bureaucracy and existing limitations would allow for the consolidation of a long-term investment flow, impacting economic growth and regional development.
