Scandal between Wanda Nara and Mauro Icardi: a court ruling was leaked and a war of versions erupted over USD 90,000

The legal battle between Wanda Nara and Mauro Icardi has added a new chapter after documents related to the child support for their daughters were leaked. The leak of a ruling attributed to Judge Adrián Hagopián has sparked conflicting reports about the footballer's financial obligations and the validity of the judicial measures.

While the businesswoman publicly celebrated the information, the forward questioned her interpretation and claimed that different files were being mixed up. His circle also responded, stating that the mentioned decisions had been modified by a higher instance.

What the file shared by Naiara Vecchio says

Journalist Naiara Vecchio shared judicial information related to the conflict and stated that the child support of USD 30,000 remains in effect.

“There is no ruling that modifies the current child support: 30,000 dollars”, she explained.

The communicator also noted that the ruling included a financial penalty for alleged non-compliance related to September and October.

“Fine of 50% for unjustified non-compliance for September and October: 15,000 USD for each month. OSDE is owed. They mix documents to confuse”, she published.

According to the initial information released, the amount claimed for those two months would total USD 90,000, including the child support amounts and the mentioned penalty.

However, the current scope of that figure is one of the points being discussed by the parties.

Mauro Icardi's response to the claims about his debt

The forward used his social media to question the data that began circulating about his judicial situation.

Under the phrase “Document kills narrative”, he published a statement in which he distinguished different actions and claimed that some of the mentioned measures had been revoked.

Among his assertions, he pointed out that the Court nullified the 50% fine and that the Justice rejected a request to prevent him from leaving the country.

He also stated that the amount approved in favor of Nara corresponded to support that, according to his version, had already been paid.

“Don't lie to people so much. If you need money, go work. Chimuertos!”, he expressed.

Icardi's circle claimed he has already paid USD 500,000

The controversy continued when acquaintances of the footballer spoke with Ciudad Magazine and offered another explanation regarding the leaked document.

“That is the first ruling from Hagopián”, they pointed out.

According to that version, lawyers Lara Piro and Elba Marcovecchio filed an appeal and “the Court rejected the requests that Hagopián had ordered”.

They also defended the economic and judicial situation of the forward.

“He can leave the country because he paid 500 thousand dollars. He is not a debtor for child support”, they asserted.

The figure and the supposed effect of that payment were communicated by the player's circle. A complete judicial ruling that would allow independent verification of all those aspects was not released along with those statements.

The medical coverage for the daughters is also under discussion

Another point raised by Vecchio was an alleged debt related to OSDE, the prepaid medical company that provides coverage for the ex-couple's daughters.

The journalist included that claim among the obligations that, according to the documentation she shared, would still be pending.

The footballer, for his part, maintains that the published versions confuse different files and judicial decisions.

What needs clarification in the legal confrontation

The main difference between both versions is the validity of the leaked ruling and the effect of the appeal filed by Icardi's defense.

The existence of a first-instance document does not, by itself, establish whether all its measures continue to apply after an intervention by the Court.

While Wanda Nara and her circle maintain their claims, the footballer insists that he has no outstanding child support debts.