The Kirchnerist Diego Brancatelli, without any sense, stated that he partially changed his view on the action that ended with an annulled goal for Egypt and admitted that, had it happened against the Argentine National Team, we Argentinians would not have liked it.
"The euphoria, looking at it from a distance and analyzing it coldly, gives me the feeling that if the foul called against Argentina, which annulled the goal, had been against us, we would be very angry, that it was a stomp, it was a little foul that worked in our favor, that the goal was annulled," he recounted in a nonsensical analysis.
Inexplicably, he also questioned the consistency of the refereeing criteria by comparing that play with the action that led to the penalty for Argentina: "And then, if that was a foul, the one for the penalty, from which the third goal comes, also, because first he makes a little touch on the ball and then you can see that the Argentine player drags the leg of the Egyptian man."
Finally, Brancatelli, in his delirium, emphasized that these types of actions bring back the debate on refereeing analysis and the influence of television replays.
"Well, but that's the controversial part, that's what gets analyzed, there lies the situation of discussion and debate that is worth watching a thousand times. And there is something that is exposed once again, one thing is the quick play and another thing is the slow motion," described the anti-Argentine National Team.
