The deputy appropriated a 360 m² house for USD 22,050 and an apartment in CABA for $9.3 million.
The situation takes on greater political relevance given that Paulón has been trying to publicly position himself for months with unfounded criticism of the assets of national government officials, which rekindled the debate about the double rod of Kirchner's leaders and their lack of financial transparency.
Esteban Paulón is a national deputy identified with extreme left positions and strong activism within the LGBT movement. Her figure gained public notoriety for her promotion of initiatives related to gender identity and her active participation in debates about these policies
.In recent months, his name began to circulate strongly on social networks, where different users questioned him based on publications, photos and videos related to his political activity and his link with trans activism organizations.
Much of the criticism is focused on its defense of regulations that enable gender change and medical treatment for minors, as well as on its support for policies related to so-called “trans children”, which generate controversy
in large sectors of society.In this context, his positions and public publications led to accusations and strong rejection by numerous users, who question his role in these debates and the scope of the policies he promotes.
The national deputy Esteban Paulón was strongly exposed after learning details of his last affidavit of assets, which include properties with strikingly low valuations compared to market prices.
According to the documentation submitted to the AFIP for the 2023 period, Paulón declared a house located in the province of Santa Fe with an area of 362 square meters for a value of USD 22,050. This is a figure that, at first glance, is well below the usual values for properties of that size.
The same statement also includes an apartment in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, acquired in December 2023, with a valuation of $9,350,750. Again, the amount declared is considerably lower than the average real estate market prices in Buenos Aires for similar units
.Both properties are listed as purchased with “own income”, as indicated in the official form. In the case of the property in Santa Fe, it is also detailed that it is a “house room”, while the property in CABA is listed as a “department” with destination for “others”.
The dissemination of these data raised questions about the consistency of the reported valuations, especially in a context where the Argentine real estate market maintains much higher values even in
